In-N-Out Burger | TheTMCA.com

4 Apr, 2022

In-N-Out Trade Dress Dispute Part III: To Squirt, or Not to Squirt?

Welcome to the final chapter of our Burger War Trilogy. In our earlier installments, Part I and Part II, we discussed the secondary meaning surveys proffered by both parties in this trade dress dispute. We now turn to In-N-Out’s likelihood of confusion study in this continue reading...

Trade Dress

28 Mar, 2022

In-N-Out Burger Trade Dress Dispute Part II: Where’s The Beef?

Last week we introduced our readers to the imbroglio featuring the burger behemoth In-N-Out, who accused upstart Doll N’ Burgers of infringing In-N-Out’s registered and unregistered trade dress. Typical of these sorts of savory squabbles, both sides retained consumer survey experts, both experts took broadsides continue reading...

Trade Dress

21 Mar, 2022

In-N-Out Trade Dress Dispute: Court Finds Alleged Flaws in Survey Evidence a “Nothing Burger”

A burger brouhaha involving the Lanham Act is well underway in the Wolverine state. Plaintiff In-N-Out Burgers operates hundreds of fast food joints in the West. Defendant Doll n’ Burger recently opened two locations in Michigan. In-N-Out filed suit in Michigan alleging that Doll n’ continue reading...

Tagged: In-N-Out Burger

In-N-Out Trade Dress Dispute Part III: To Squirt, or Not to Squirt?

In-N-Out Burger Trade Dress Dispute Part II: Where’s The Beef?

In-N-Out Trade Dress Dispute: Court Finds Alleged Flaws in Survey Evidence a “Nothing Burger”

Subscribe to Blog via Email

About Our IP Practice Group

Categories

Editors

Managers

Disclaimer