Tagged: scandalousness

5 Jun, 2018

WTF? USPTO to Continue Refusing Scandalous and Immoral Marks…For Now

In light of ongoing litigation over an applicant’s effort to register the mark FUCT for wearing apparel, the USPTO recently issued an Examination Guide concerning the review of trademark applications under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which bars registration of marks that consist of continue reading...

Disclaimer

By accessing the TMCA blog, you are requesting information. The information you are requesting is not legal advice, advertising or solicitation. Transmission and receipt of the materials on the blog do not constitute legal advice, establish an attorney-client relationship, or create any duty of Dorsey to any reader. An attorney-client relationship with Dorsey may be established only by an engagement letter signed by a Dorsey lawyer. Information sent to Dorsey by persons who are not clients of the firm is not subject to any duty of confidentiality on the part of the firm.

The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on the blog are the opinions of the authors only and not those of Dorsey.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Some of the content on this blog is considered Attorney Advertising under the applicable rules of certain states. Results depend on a number of factors unique to each matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Tagged: scandalousness

WTF? USPTO to Continue Refusing Scandalous and Immoral Marks…For Now

Subscribe to Blog via Email

About Our IP Practice Group

Categories

Editors

Managers

Disclaimer